[News] TSMC’s Former VP Burn Lin and Others Discuss How the US Chip Act Hurts Taiwan

---

---

According to a report by TechNews citing an article from the international column Project Syndicate, Burn Lin, former R&D Vice President of TSMC, Chintay Shih, former President of the Industrial Technology Research Institute, and Chang-Tai Hsieh, an Academia Sinica member and economics professor at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, collaborated on an article titled “How America’s CHIPS Act Hurts Taiwan.”

In the article, they collectively elucidated how US semiconductor subsidies weaken TSMC’s strength, rendering the entire semiconductor industry more vulnerable. Additionally, they expressed concern that if China were to blockade or invade Taiwan, the supply chain would become compromised.

The US CHIPS and Science Act, aiming to address this issue with a USD 52 billion subsidy, seeks to encourage semiconductor manufacturers to relocate to the United States. However, according to the report addressing on the design of the bill, its objectives may not be achievable and could even weaken Taiwan’s most crucial industry, posing a threat to Taiwan’s security.

Concerns Arise Over Chip Act Threatening Taiwan’s Security

Currently, the semiconductor industry is dominated by specialized companies distributed globally. TSMC specializes in contract manufacturing, focusing primarily on high-end chips. Other important companies include AMD, NVIDIA, Qualcomm, ASML, Tokyo Electron, and Arm.

Specialization in the industry offers two major benefits.

Firstly, each part of the global supply chain can concentrate on its core expertise and advance further, benefiting other supply chains. Secondly, the production capacity of each link in the global supply chain increases, enhancing resilience against demand shocks.

The cost of specialization is that the industry becomes vulnerable to supply shocks. This issue is not unique to Taiwan; all segments of the supply chain face potential bottlenecks.

However, unlike other segments, Taiwan is reportedly confronted with territorial claims from China. Therefore, the United States and Japan have offered substantial subsidies for TSMC’s relocation. TSMC is constructing new factories in Kumamoto, Japan, and Phoenix, Arizona, in the United States.

Currently, Fab 1 in Kumamoto has been completed according to plan, and many of TSMC’s suppliers have also set up shop there. However, the Arizona plant is substantially behind schedule, and fewer TSMC suppliers have followed suit to establish operations in the United States.

Moreover, TSMC’s experience at its Portland plant in Washington state over the past 25 years has raised doubts about the prospects of the Arizona plant. TSMC struggled to find competitive workers there; even with identical training and equipment, production costs in the U.S. were still 50% higher than in Taiwan. Therefore, TSMC chose not to expand its Portland plant further.

Still, the fundamental issue lies in the fact that while American workers are skilled in chip design technology, they lack the skills required for chip manufacturing, which is crucial in this field.

The article further mentions that TSMC’s Phoenix plant will continue to struggle because there is a shortage of American workers with the skills necessary for semiconductor manufacturing.

As warned by TSMC’s founder, Morris Chang, in 2022, seeking economic security by relocating semiconductor manufacturing to the United States is an expensive exercise in futility. Furthermore, while the USD 52 billion subsidy from the United States may seem substantial, it is insufficient to establish a self-sufficient semiconductor ecosystem in Phoenix.

Additionally, the article points out that Taiwan’s industrial planners have deliberately chosen a niche market built upon existing manufacturing advantages, without attempting to replicate the model of the leading Intel at that time, due to the scarcity of Taiwanese workers with the necessary design skills. Similarly, Japan’s subsidies for TSMC are likely to succeed because Japan already possesses an ample supply of skilled manufacturing workers.

The article also highlights three major risks brought about by the US chip act at the end:

Firstly, if TSMC shifts its focus and loses its investment in innovation, the biggest losses will be incurred by its customers and suppliers, most of which are American companies.

Moreover, it may hinder AI development, as this field largely relies on TSMC-manufactured advanced chips. Consequently, TSMC may reduce its investment in production capacity in Taiwan, reducing the entire semiconductor industry’s ability to withstand demand shocks.

Lastly, TSMC may lose its way and risk being replaced by other companies, losing its leadership position in the field of advanced semiconductor manufacturing.

Well-Intentioned US Chip Act with Poor Design May Ultimately Harm Taiwan’s Economy

The commentary suggests that despite the well-intentioned nature of the US chip act, its design is flawed. Instead of establishing a sustainable semiconductor manufacturing cluster in the United States, it may result in long-term damage to TSMC and ultimately harm Taiwan’s economy.

A better approach for the United States, per the report, would be to protect its own economic security while strengthening Taiwan’s, committing to defend Taiwan, and building production capacity in countries like Japan. This strategy may be more prudent in the long run.

Read more

• [News] Latest Overview on TSMC’s Global Expansion Initiatives
• Strategic Collaboration Between Intel and UMC to Optimize FinFET Foundry Market with Existing Resources, Says TrendForce

(Photo credit: TSMC)