Following its success in the LCD panel market, China’s BOE Technology Group plans to lead in the OLED panel sector as well. According to a report from Japanese media outlet Nikkei News on May 27th, BOE, China’s largest panel manufacturer, plans to boost its OLED panel production capacity by more than a half compared to the current level within the next three years.
As per the same report from Nikkei News, BOE has established a series of LCD plants with support from the Chinese government. In the OLED panel sector, BOE is also said to be eyeing on becoming the market leader by expanding production and catching up with South Korean companies like Samsung Electronics.
Reportedly, BOE’s new OLED panel plant “B16” in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, began construction in late March. The goal is to complete the plant building by 2024, install manufacturing equipment by September 2025, and start mass production in 2026, producing 8.6-generation OLED panels. BOE’s competitor, Samsung Electronics, is also said to be looking for mass production of 8.6-generation OLED panels in 2026 by upgrading its existing plants.
The same report further indicates that BOE is actively hiring talented professionals from Japan and South Korea and leveraging global suppliers. Thus, BOE’s OLED panel technology has reportedly gained recognition, successfully entering Apple’s iPhone OLED panel supply chain, serving as a catalyst for its growth.
According to a report by Cailianpress in April, BOE’s financial forecast indicates that its net profit for the first quarter of 2024 is expected to reach CNY 800 million to 1 billion, a year-on-year increase of 223% to 304%. The basic earnings per share are estimated to be around CNY 0.021 to 0.026.
Previously, the South Korean media outlet TheElec reported that Apple was in negotiations with three panel manufacturers—Samsung, BOE, and Tianma—regarding the supply for the iPhone SE 4. In a previous report from ZDNet Korea, it indicated that Samsung withdrew from the supply due to pricing issues, and Tianma reportedly did not meet Apple’s quality requirements, making BOE the most likely supplier.
Read more
(Photo credit: BOE)