The risks associated with the United States’ suppression of China’s semiconductor industry and the ongoing tension in China-US relations continue to permeate the supply chain. However, most customers of foundries are adopting a cautious approach, either maintaining a wait-and-see attitude or gradually introducing second sources to mitigate risks.

The operational conditions and challenges faced by China’s two major foundries, SMIC and HuaHong, differ to some extent. In the case of SMIC, despite being added to the U.S. Entity List as early as 2020, most of its customers continue to place orders with SMIC due to concerns about the time-consuming and costly nature of verification.

According to a survey by TrendForce, only one U.S.-based brand is actively pursuing a decoupling strategy in response to U.S. government bids, while other brands are mostly conducting risk assessments of their supply chains without fully implementing a complete decoupling strategy.

In particular, SMIC still maintains a competitive edge in terms of lower prices and the advantage of the domestic Chinese market, which keeps most of its customers placing orders and prevents a significant drop in overall capacity utilization rate compared to other foundries. Its utilization rate in 1Q23 was approximately 65-70%, and it is expected to slightly increase to nearly 70% in 2Q23.

HuaHong, on the other hand, is taking a cautious approach to address the risks arising from the China-US tension. HuaHong’s subsidiary, ICRD, primarily focuses on process technology R&D, with a particular emphasis on the 28/14nm process nodes.

It is currently setting up a specialized 28nm production line, which uses photolithography equipment from two major international manufacturers, ASML and Nikon. For all other equipment, Chinese domestically manufactured machines are being used as substitutes.

The planned total production capacity for this production line is 40Kwspm ( wafer starts per month). Considering the possibility of both Japan and the Netherlands potentially joining trade sanctions later this year, the future expansion plans for HuaHong’s production capacity are uncertain.

(Photo Credit: SMIC)

TrendForce’s latest research indicates that, as production cuts to DRAM and NAND Flash have not kept pace with weakening demand, the ASP of some products is expected to decline further in 2Q23. DRAM prices are projected to fall 13~18%; NAND Flash is expected to fall between 8~13%.

On the other hand, based on the weekly updates on the DRAM and NAND flash spot markets by TrendForce, the spot markets for DRAM and NAND flash continued to decline this week. Details are as follows.

DRAM Spot Market

Spot prices of DDR4 products have been dropping incrementally for several consecutive days, and buyers in the spot market are mostly waiting for further developments. However, there are more quote inquiries for DDR5 products because the supply gap hasn’t been bridged. As a result, there is now an uptick in spot prices of DDR5 products, and the divergence between DDR4 and DDR5 products in terms of price trajectory is expected to continue for several weeks. Nevertheless, spot prices of DDR4 products are showing no sign of rebounding in the near future. The average spot price of mainstream chips (i.e., DDR4 1Gx8 2666MT/s) fell by 0.74% from US$ 1.618 last week to US$ 1.606 this week.

NAND Flash Spot Market

European and American spot markets have yet to recover in purchase sentiment, while some Asian markets, due to the recuperation of the Chinese market, have slightly risen in purchase willingness. Overall spots have not experienced any apparent fluctuations from South Korean suppliers’ announcement of production cuts, despite sellers aggressively adjusting their prices and pursuing orders, which led to a restricted level of overall transactions and a small drop in prices. 512Gb TLC wafer has dropped by 0.35% in spot prices this week, arriving at US$1.431.

Onsemi, a semiconductor manufacturer, announced at the end of April that it had signed a Long-Term Supply Agreement for SiC power components with Zeekr, a subsidiary of Geely Auto Group. Geely Automotive will use Onsemi’s EliteSiC power components to optimize energy conversion efficiency in its electric drive system. This move signals Onsemi’s aggressive expansion in the automotive SiC market, catching up to leading manufacturers STMicroelectronics and Infineon.

In the SiC semiconductor market for electric vehicles, STMicroelectronics and Infineon have maintained their market leadership by entering the market early, while Wolfspeed and ROHM have gained traction through their vertical integration technology for SiC. On the other hand, Onsemi still lags behind in terms of market share for SiC power semiconductors, even though it acquired GT Advanced Technologies in 2021 and mastered the most difficult wafer growth and production equipment technology in SiC manufacturing. Before 2023, Onsemi was only used in small and medium-sized vehicle models such as NIO and Lucid.

However, Onsemi’s benefits begin to materialize in 2023, thanks to the industry maturity built by early players such as Infineon and STM, combined with Onsemi’s early deployment of SiC-related technology. Onsemi’s SiC product EliteSiC has obtained LTSA from Zeekr, BMW, Hyundai and Volkswagen in the form of discrete and modules. Its CEO, Hassane El-Khoury, has stated that the SiC business will generate $4 billion in revenue over the next three years compared to the total revenue for the 2022 SiC market of approximately $1.1 billion. These factors have made Onsemi the most talked-about semiconductor company in the SiC market this year.

However, the intense competition in the SiC market will test the endurance of resource input sustainability. The rapid growth in SiC demand over the past five years is mainly due to high battery costs and the development of energy density having reached its limit. Car manufacturers have switched to using SiC chips in their electronic components to increase driving range without increasing the number of batteries.

As a result, car manufacturers are aggressively pushing semiconductor companies to accelerate their research and development of SiC technology. This has resulted in a significant reduction in R&D time, but also an increase in R&D costs. Coupled with the impact of intense market competition on profits, the ability to sustain R&D resource input and overall profitability performance will be the key indicators of semiconductor companies’ competitiveness.

Onsemi has successfully improved its profitability performance by streamlining its product lines over the past few years, ranking at the top with a 49% gross margin, according to the financial reports of various semiconductor companies in 2022. This profitability performance allows Onsemi to meet car manufacturers’ cost requirements and secure orders, thereby achieving economies of scale in SiC product growth.

However, in terms of R&D costs as a percentage of revenue, Onsemi ranks last at 7%, compared to its main competitors Wolfspeed (26%), Infineon (13%), STM (12%), and ROHM (8%). With semiconductor companies investing more in technologies such as reducing on-resistance and improving yield rates, how to maintain a balance between profitability performance and resource expenditure while achieving revenue goals through intense market competition will be an important challenge for Onsemi after securing orders from car manufacturers.

(Source: Zeekr)

Samsung recently announced that they will ahead of TSMC in the foundry market within 5 years. At the same time, Intel also claimed to become the second-largest player in the market before 2030. Currently, both Samsung and TSMC are adapting 3nm process to do the chip manufacturing, with the technology of GAA(Samsung) and FinFET(TSMC) respectively.

Samsung sees GAA technology as a crucial key to surpassing TSMC. Currently, Samsung’s 4nm lags behind TSMC by about 2 years, and its 3nm is about a year behind. However, this situation will change when TSMC turns to 2nm. Industry insider sources indicate that TSMC plans to use GAA technology in 2nm process, and Samsung believes that they can seize the chance to catch up with TSMC since TSMC may have a hard time when turning to 2nm process.

Industry insiders have revealed that AMD has shifted some of its 4nm CPU chip orders from TSMC to Samsung. It is reported that AMD has signed an agreement with Samsung to manufacture some of its mobile SoC by using Samsung’s 4nm node, and Samsung may also manufacture AMD’s Chromebook APU.

The Fight in the Foundry Market is On

According to TrendForce, the top 10 global foundry players in 4Q22 with TSMC account for 58.5% of market share by revenue, far ahead of Samsung’s 15.8%. Industry insiders suggest that Samsung still has a long way to go to catch up with TSMC. Some sources say that TSMC’s 2nm process will be mass-produced as scheduled in 2025, while Samsung’s plans are still to be observed.

Intel is also striving for the top spot in the wafer foundry market. Since the beginning of 2021, Intel has implemented a series of measures in its foundry business after announcing its “IDM 2.0” strategy. Last July, Intel stated that it will manufacture chips for MediaTek, and the first batch of products will be produced within the next 18 to 24 months using more mature manufacturing technology (Intel 16). In addition, Intel said that Qualcomm and Nvidia are also interested in having them manufacture their chips. To regain its leading edge in chip manufacturing, Intel has unveiled its 5 process technology stages to be launched in the next few years, including 10nm, 7nm, 4nm, 3nm, and 20A.

And TSMC has no competitive relationship with their clients by not doing the wafer design, apparently, this is also a significant advantage for TSMC and other foundry manufacturers. In recent years, more companies have recognized the importance and highly profitable nature of foundry manufacturing, leading to the independent establishment of foundry manufacturing operations. Samsung and Intel have also followed this trend, as foundry manufacturing can optimize production technology and provide major companies with more opportunities for trial and error.

The US ban on Chinese industries has left China struggling with a seemingly severe shortage of chips. However, China’s tech giants refuse to surrender; instead, they’re pivoting quickly to survive the game.

Since 2019, the US Department of Commerce has added Chinese leading companies like Huawei to its entity list. Restrictions were expanded in 2020 to include semiconductor manufacturing, making a huge impact on SMIC’s advanced processes below 14nm.

Starting in 2021, the US has been intensifying its control by placing more IC design houses on the list, which include Jingjia (GPU), Shenwei (CPU), Loongson Tech (CPU), Cambricon (AI), Wayzim (RF&GPS), and Yangtze (NAND Flash). Furthermore, the export of advanced EDA tools, equipment, CPUs, and GPUs to China has also been banned.

The goal of such measures is to hinder China’s progress in high-tech fields such as 5G/6G, AI, Cloud computing, and autonomous driving by eroding the dominance of its tech giants over time.

China has been aggressively pursuing a policy of domestic substitution in response to the US’s increasing control. As part of this effort, leading domestic IC design companies like Horizon, Cambricon, Enflame, Biren, Gigadevice, and Nations Technologies have been ramping up their efforts for comprehensive chip upgrades in a variety of applications.

Chinese Brands Ramping up for ASICs

There is a particularly intriguing phenomenon in recent years. Since 2019, China’s leading brands have been venturing into chip design to develop highly specialized ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits) at an unprecedented speed. This move is aimed at ensuring a stable supply of chips and also advancing their technical development.

A closer look at how top companies across diverse application fields integrate ASIC chips into their technology roadmap:

• AI Cloud computing: Alibaba, Baidu, Tencent

China’s tech giants are leveraging advanced foundry processes, such as TSMC’s 5nm and Samsung’s 7nm, to produce cutting-edge AI chips for high-end applications like cloud computing, image coding, AI computing, and network chips.

Alibaba launched its AI chip, Hanguang 800, and server CPU, Yitian 710, in 2019 and 2021, respectively. Both chips were manufactured at TSMC’s 5nm process and are extensively used on Alibaba’s cloud computing platform.

In December 2019, Baidu released its AI chip, Kunlun Xin, which uses Samsung’s 14nm process, followed by its 2nd generation, which uses a 7nm process, for AI and image coding.

• Smartphone: Xiaomi, Vivo, OPPO

Due to the high technical threshold of SoC technology used in smartphones, mobile phone brands mainly develop their own chips by optimizing image, audio, and power processing.

In the year of 2021, Xiaomi released the ISP Surge C1, followed by the PMIC Surge P1. Vivo first released the ISP V1 in September 2021, followed by an upgraded product, V1+, in April 2022, and then V2 in November 2022.
OPPO, on the other hand, unveiled the MariSilicon X NPU in December 2021, which enhances the image processing performance of smartphones, using TSMC’s 6nm process, and later revealed the MariSilicon Y Bluetooth audio SoC TSMC’s 6nm RF process later in 2022.

• Home appliance: Konka, Midea, Changhong, Skyworth

The brands are focusing primarily on MCU and PMIC chips that are essential to a wide range of home appliances. They’re also incorporating SoC chips into their smart TVs.

For example, Hisense has jumped into the SoC game in January 2022 by releasing an 8K AI image chip for their smart TVs. Changhong manufactured an MCU with RISC-V architecture and a 40nm process in December 2022.

• Autonomous driving: NIO, Xiaopeng, Li Auto, BYD

The leading companies are developing ISP and highly technical SoC chips for autonomous driving, which has resulted in a slower development process.

In 2020, NIO formed a semiconductor design team for Autonomous driving chips and ISP. Xiaopeng started its Autonomous driving and ISP chip R&D project in the first half of 2021. Li Auto established two subsidiaries in 2022, with a primary focus on power semiconductors and ISP chips.

Finally, BYD, which has a long history of working on MCU and power semiconductor components, also announced its entry into the autonomous driving chip market in 2022.

Navigating the US’ Tech Crackdown

So why are these brands investing so heavily in self-developed ASICs?

One reason is to avoid the risks associated with export control policies from the US and its allies. Developing their own chips would mitigate the risk of supply chain disruptions caused by potential blockades, ensuring a stable supply and the sustainability of their technology roadmap.

In addition, there are many internal incentives for these brands – for instance, companies that have self-developed chips will be eligible for more government subsidies, as this aligns with the government’s aggressive policy to foster the semiconductor industry. Brands can also reduce their reliance on external suppliers by using their own ASIC chips, which can further lower the operating costs.

Technology wise, ASIC chips allow brands to enhance the features they require and enable better integration with the software, which could provide efficiency gains at system level – similar strategies are also being employed by Google and AWS with their AI chips, as well as by Apple with its M1 SoC.

With all things considered, it is certainly possible that we will see a persistent trend of more self-developed ASIC chips made by Chinese brands, which could potentially lead to significant changes in China’s semiconductor supply chain from the ground up.