According to the Korea Economic Daily. Samsung Electronics’ HBM3 and packaging services have passed AMD’s quality tests. The upcoming Instinct MI300 series AI chips from AMD are planned to incorporate Samsung’s HBM3 and packaging services. These chips, which combine central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), and HBM3, are expected to be released in the fourth quarter of this year.

Samsung is noted as the sole provider capable of offering advanced packaging solutions and HBM products simultaneously. Originally considering TSMC’s advanced packaging services, AMD had to alter its plans due to capacity constraints.

The surge in demand for high-performance GPUs within the AI landscape benefits not only GPU manufacturers like NVIDIA and AMD, but also propels the development of HBM and advanced packaging.

In the backdrop of the AI trend, AIGC model training and inference require the deployment of AI servers. These servers typically require mid-to-high-end GPUs, with HBM penetration nearing 100% among these GPUs.

Presently, Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron are the primary HBM manufacturers. According to the latest research by TrendForce, driven by the expansion efforts of these original manufacturers, the estimated annual growth rate of HBM supply in 2024 is projected to reach 105%.

In terms of competitive dynamics, SK Hynix leads with its HBM3 products, serving as the primary supplier for NVIDIA’s Server GPUs. Samsung, on the other hand, focuses on fulfilling orders from other cloud service providers. With added orders from customers, the gap in market share between Samsung and SK Hynix is expected to narrow significantly this year. The estimated HBM market share for both companies is about 95% for 2023 to 2024. However, variations in customer composition might lead to sequential variations in bit shipments.

In the realm of advanced packaging capacity, TSMC’s CoWoS packaging technology dominates as the main choice for AI server chip suppliers. Amidst strong demand for high-end AI chips and HBM, TrendForce estimates that TSMC’s CoWoS monthly capacity could reach 12K by the end of 2023.

With strong demand driven by NVIDIA’s A100 and H100 AI Server requirements, demand for CoWoS capacity is expected to rise by nearly 50% compared to the beginning of the year. Coupled with the growth in high-end AI chip demand from companies like AMD and Google, the latter half of the year could experience tighter CoWoS capacity. This robust demand is expected to continue into 2024, potentially leading to a 30-40% increase in advanced packaging capacity, contingent on equipment readiness.

(Photo credit: Samsung)

In response to the demands of high-performance computing, AI, 5G, and other applications, the shift towards chiplet and the incorporation of HBM memory has become inevitable for advanced chips. As a result, packaging has transitioned from 2D to 2.5D and 3D formats.

With chip manufacturing advancing towards more advanced process nodes, the model of directly packaging chips using advanced packaging technology from wafer foundries has emerged. However, this approach also signifies that wafer foundries will encroach upon certain aspects of traditional assembly and testing, leading to ongoing discussions about the ‘threat’ to traditional assembly and test firms since TSMC’s entry into advanced packaging in 2011.

But is this perspective accurate?

In fact, traditional assembly and test firms remain competitively positioned. Firstly, numerous electronic products still rely on their diverse traditional packaging techniques. Particularly, with the rapid growth of AIoT, electric vehicles, and drones, the required electronic components often still adopt traditional packaging methods. Secondly, faced with wafer foundries actively entering the advanced packaging domain, traditional assembly and test firms have not been idle, presenting concrete solutions to the challenge.

Advanced Packaging Innovations by Traditional Assembly and Test Firms

Since 2023, AI and AI server trends have rapidly emerged, driving the demand for AI chips. TSMC’s 2.5D advanced packaging technology, known as CoWoS, has played a pivotal role. However, the sudden surge in demand stretched TSMC’s capacity. In response, major traditional assembly and test firms such as ASE and Amkor have demonstrated their technical prowess and have no intention of being absent from this field.

For instance, ASE’s FOCoS technology enables the integration of HBM and ASIC. It restructures multiple chips into a fan-out module, which is then placed on the substrate, achieving the integration of multiple chips. Their FOCoS-Bridge technology, unveiled in May this year, utilizes silicon bridges (Si Bridge) to accomplish 2.5D packaging, bolstering the creation of advanced chips required for applications like AI, data centers, and servers.

Additionally, SPIL, a subsidiary of ASE, offers the FO-EB technology, a powerful integration of logic IC and HBM. As depicted below, this technology eschews silicon interposers, utilizing silicon bridges and redistribution layers (RDL) for connections, similarly capable of 2.5D packaging.

Another major player, Amkor, has not only collaborated with Samsung to develop the H-Cube advanced packaging solution but has also long been involved in ‘CoWoS-like technology.’ Through intermediary layers and through-silicon via (TSV) technology, Amkor can interconnect different chips, also possessing 2.5D advanced packaging capabilities.

China’s major assembly and test firm, Jiangsu Changjiang Electronics Technology (JCET), employs the XDFOI technology, integrating logic ICs with HBM through TSV, RDL, and microbump techniques, aimed at high-performance computing.

Given the recent surge in demand for high-end GPU chips, TSMC’s CoWoS capacity has fallen short, and NVIDIA is actively seeking support from second or even third suppliers. The ASE Group and Amkor have secured partial orders through their packaging technologies. This clearly illustrates that traditional assembly and test firms, even when faced with the entry of wafer foundries into the advanced packaging domain, still possess the capability to compete.

In terms of product types, wafer foundries focus on advanced packaging technology for major players like NVIDIA and AMD. Meanwhile, other products not in the highest-end category still opt for traditional assembly and test firms like ASE, Amkor, and JCET for manufacturing. Overall, with their presence in advanced packaging, as well as a hold on the expanding existing packaging market, traditional assembly and test firms continue to maintain their market competitiveness.

(Photo credit: Amkor)

According to Taiwan’s Commercial Times, TSMC continues to face challenges from ongoing price undercutting and competitive bidding in mature semiconductor manufacturing processes. Concerns arise about the company’s ability to offset these challenges with AI-related orders. Reports from the market suggest that on July 20th, TSMC revised down its fiscal forecast for the year for the second time, slashing its annual revenue target (in USD) from an anticipated decline of 1% to 6% to a significant reduction of 10%. However, given the persistent sluggish economic conditions of late, there is speculation of a potential third adjustment that could lead to a year-on-year revenue decline of 12%.

In the current investment landscape, artificial intelligence has become a focal point this year. Additionally, the strong demand for CoWoS packaging has contributed to a positive outlook for TSMC. However, it’s important to note that AI’s contribution to TSMC’s overall revenue is not substantial.

Using the popular H100 model from NVIDIA as an example, it only impacts TSMC’s performance in the N4 manufacturing process. This limited contribution falls short of countering the downward trend in consumer product demand utilizing the N3 and N7 manufacturing processes.

Market Speculations Emerge About TSMC’s Performance and Challenges

Market sources indicate that TSMC’s performance in mature processes (7nm and above) accounted for 47% of its output in the second quarter. While prices managed to hold steady in the first half of the year, ongoing softness in end-user demand has prompted Chinese manufacturers to engage in aggressive expansion, price reduction, and competition for orders, which inevitably impacts TSMC. There are even reports circulating about a potential loosening of 7nm production capacity.

In response, TSMC stated that its perspective and outlook on market demand align with the contents of its July press conference. As of now, no new updates are available. Furthermore, TSMC refrains from commenting on market speculations or shifts in customer business dynamics.

(Photo credit: TSMC)

According to a report by Taiwan’s Commercial Times, JPMorgan’s latest analysis reveals that AI demand will remain robust in the second half of the year. Encouragingly, TSMC’s CoWoS capacity expansion progress is set to exceed expectations, with production capacity projected to reach 28,000 to 30,000 wafers per month by the end of next year.

The trajectory of CoWoS capacity expansion is anticipated to accelerate notably in the latter half of 2024. This trend isn’t limited to TSMC alone; other players outside the TSMC are also actively expanding their CoWoS-like production capabilities to meet the soaring demands of AI applications.

Gokul Hariharan, Head of Research for JPMorgan Taiwan, highlighted that industry surveys indicate strong and unabated AI demand in the latter half of the year. Shortages amounting to 20% to 30% are observed with CoWoS capacity being a key bottleneck and high-bandwidth memory (HBM) also facing supply shortages.

JPMorgan’s estimates indicate that Nvidia will account for 60% of the overall CoWoS demand in 2023. TSMC is expected to produce around 1.8 to 1.9 million sets of H100 chips, followed by significant demand from Broadcom, AWS’ Inferentia chips, and Xilinx. Looking ahead to 2024, TSMC’s continuous capacity expansion is projected to supply Nvidia with approximately 4.1 to 4.2 million sets of H100 chips.

Apart from TSMC’s proactive expansion of CoWoS capacity, Hariharan predicts that other assembly and test facilities are also accelerating their expansion of CoWoS-like capacities.

For instance, UMC is preparing to have a monthly capacity of 5,000 to 6,000 wafers for the interposer layer by the latter half of 2024. Amkor is expected to provide a certain capacity for chip-on-wafer stacking technology, and ASE Group will offer chip-on-substrate bonding capacity. However, these additional capacities might face challenges in ramping up production for the latest products like H100, potentially focusing more on older-generation products like A100 and A800.

(Photo credit: TSMC)

As semiconductor process technology nears known physical limits, the spotlight among major industry players is shifting towards the development of advanced packaging. Concurrently, the rise of applications like artificial intelligence and AIGC has propelled the concept of advanced packaging into a new technological wave. In the midst of the semiconductor industry’s global competition, securing more orders has become a core objective for major players.

A Competitive Landscape in Advanced Packaging

The competition in advanced packaging technology is intensifying, with companies pouring substantial investments into the field, resulting in a landscape of vigorous competition. Various packaging technologies have emerged, with notable offerings from industry giants such as TSMC, Intel, and Samsung.

TSMC introduced 3DFabric, an integration of its TSMC-SoIC front-end technology with CoWoS and InFO back-end technologies, providing maximum flexibility for diverse innovative product designs.

Intel, on the other hand, features its 2.5D EMIB and 3D Foveros packaging technologies. EMIB is applied in the connection of logic chips and high-bandwidth memory, as seen in the Intel Xeon Max series and Intel Data Center GPU Max series.

Foveros allows top dies to overcome size limitations and accommodate more top and base dies, connected through copper pillars to reduce potential interference from through-silicon vias (TSVs).

Samsung also exhibits strong competitiveness in advanced packaging, with its 2.5D I-Cube4 and H-Cube, along with 3D X-Cube packaging technologies, achieving breakthroughs in multi-chip interconnects and integration.

Samsung’s I-Cube4, for example, integrates four HBM stack dies and one core compute IC on the silicon interposer layer, while H-Cube enhances packaging area through the stacking of HDI PCBs to accommodate designs with six or more HBM stack dies.

Advantages of the Three Giants

In recent years, the three semiconductor giants have directed substantial capital expenditure towards advanced packaging. Their diverse technological developments and marketing strategies are poised to ignite a global battle in the semiconductor advanced packaging industry.

TSMC holds the advantage with its dominant wafer process technology and an end-to-end comprehensive service approach. Coupled with Taiwan’s robust semiconductor ecosystem, TSMC leads the way in the advanced packaging domain.

Intel, while slightly trailing TSMC in advanced process technology, matches it in advanced packaging capabilities. Emphasizing flexible foundry services, Intel allows clients to mix and match its wafer manufacturing and packaging offerings. With manufacturing facilities scattered worldwide, Intel leverages geographic advantages, particularly in Western countries, to expand capacity and services, leading to anticipated gains in the future.

Samsung, like TSMC, offers end-to-end services, but its packaging technology lags behind TSMC’s. It secures a share in constrained supply situations. Notably, Samsung, in June 2022, was ahead of TSMC in unveiling the innovative GAA 3nm process, and is poised to combine it with 3D packaging technology, potentially marking a pivotal point in the next semiconductor generation.

With semiconductor technology’s continuous evolution and surging market demand, the competition among the three giants in advanced packaging will remain fierce. While wafer fabs currently prioritize processes, the next three to five years are expected to witness a gradual shift towards advanced packaging. Different packaging technologies and marketing strategies will ultimately determine companies’ positions and influence in the market.

(Photo credit: TSMC)

Read more:

• An In-Depth Explanation of Advanced Packaging Technology: CoWoS
• ASE, Amkor, UMC and Samsung Getting a Slice of the CoWoS Market from AI Chips, Challenging TSMC