Insights
Ford announced the withdrawal of its full-year financial forecast due to the impact of the recent labor strike and ongoing challenges in the EV sector. Most consumers are reluctant to pay higher prices for electric cars compared to traditional or hybrid vehicles. Ford also postponed its planned $12 billion investment in expanding electric vehicle production capacity but remains committed to its goal of advancing its electric vehicle business.
TrendForce’s Insights:
The United Auto Workers (UAW) union initiated a six-week strike in Detroit starting on September 15, 2023, motivated by demands for improved compensation and benefits. The strike came to an end when consensus was reached with Ford, Stellantis, and GM (General Motors), resulting in the signing of a new contract.
According to predictions from Deutsche Bank, this new agreement will add an estimated $6.2 to $7.2 billion in costs for each of the three major automakers. This cost increase is nearly equivalent to the expense of building an electric vehicle platform. Compounded by the impact of slowing demand for global new energy vehicles (BEV and PHEV), with growth rates decreasing from 54% in 2022 to 30% in 2023, Ford announced the suspension of its $12 billion electric vehicle investment plan. This plan includes its partnership with SK On for a battery factory and a partly reduction in production capacity for the Mustang Mach-E.
GM also announced the termination of its affordable electric vehicle development project in partnership with Honda. Additionally, Tesla’s third-quarter earnings fell short of expectations, and power battery supplier Panasonic reduced production. These developments underscore the fact that the electric vehicle industry’s “overheated” market, driven by early adopters and purchase incentives, has come to an end. The industry must now focus on practical solutions to address consumer reluctance to purchase electric vehicles.
The slowdown in electric vehicle market demand stems from the issues of high vehicle prices and range anxiety, which affect consumer willingness to make a purchase. Addressing these two problems requires increasing battery energy density to achieve comparable driving range to conventional vehicles and constructing an adequate charging infrastructure. However, achieving these goals will take time and effort.
With range anxiety still unresolved and the goal of banning fossil fuel vehicles unchanged, automakers positioned between policy and the market face transition risks. At this juncture, choosing to independently develop electric vehicle platforms might add financial burden and risk, with the associated costs reflected in vehicle prices, potentially eroding competitiveness. A more practical approach would involve considering alternative development strategies, such as exploring platform outsourcing to reduce manufacturing costs.
Automakers or Tier 1 suppliers with proprietary electric vehicle platforms have the option to lease their platform production capacity to companies that are currently unable or unwilling to independently develop their own platforms. This strategy can increase production efficiency for lessees, allowing them to commission the production of all or some of their electric vehicle models from the lessor, ultimately reducing manufacturing costs and accelerating the release of new vehicle models.
By doing so, companies can maintain their market share in the electric vehicle race while waiting for the right opportunity to reevaluate the potential for developing their own electric vehicle platforms. In summary, as the demand for electric vehicles slows down, automakers will face tighter financial constraints, making it crucial for them to explore how to collaboratively leverage existing resources to create electric vehicles that align with market demands.
Read more
(Photo credit: Ford’s Facebook)
News
In an event held on October 18, 2023, Foxconn Chairman Young Liu unveiled the company’s latest electric vehicle, MODEL N, demonstrating Foxconn’s comprehensive vertical integration capabilities. He also encouraged traditional automotive companies to harness Foxconn’s strengths for their future endeavors.
Chairman Young Liu expressed his excitement at the event, saying, “I am so excited to show off our latest EV model. This is MODEL N. With this new EV, we demonstrate a full range of vertically integrated capabilities. Traditional automotive companies, yes, I’m talking to you-can tap in all of these.”
He highlighted Foxconn’s achievements in the automotive industry over the past three years, including the introduction of various eye-catching products such as high-end sedan, passenger crossover, SUV, compact pick-up, commercial bus, and commercial van.
Chairman Liu emphasized that Foxconn’s CDMS (Commissioned Design and Manufacturing Service) business model provides the automotive industry with total and bespoke solutions. This business model significantly reduces costs and shortens time to market, which are critical factors for the future success of EV.
During the event, attendees had the opportunity to explore Foxconn’s electric logistics vehicles in the morning. In the afternoon, they were introduced to LEO, Foxconn’s Low Earth Orbit satellite. This satellite has already been packed and is scheduled to launch next month.
Chairman Liu mentioned that, before this, two of Foxconn’s CSO would setp onto the Tech Day stage to share their insights and perspectives on the EV and semiconductor industries.
(Photo credit: Foxconn’s Stream)
Press Releases
As the pace of electrification accelerates in the global automotive market, and various governments worldwide implement subsidy policies that encourage consumer EV purchases, sales of new energy vehicles (NEV, which includes both BEV and PHEV) are continuing to rise as well, according to TrendForce’s latest investigations. NEV sales for 2021 are projected to reach 4.35 million units, a 49% increase YoY.
TrendForce indicates that electrification, smartization, and automation are the three key determinants of the ongoing transformation taking place in the automotive industry. Guided by these three determinants, not only are the strategies, business models, and competitions of automakers transforming, but the automotive supply chain is also changing and expanding. Upstream component suppliers and downstream manufacturers alike are now operating in accordance with new paradigms.
High potential for NEV growth entices emerging competitors to enter the market
Now that the competition between traditional and emerging automakers in the NEV market is gradually intensifying, traditional automakers have begun releasing BEVs that are based on purely electric platforms rather than preexisting ICE vehicles. However, for the vast majority of mainstream automakers, NEV sales account for less than 10% of their total car sales. These automakers are therefore placing a top priority on expanding the lineup and sales volume of their NEV models. Emerging automakers, on the other hand, are instead focusing on expanding their production capacities, and Tesla as well as Chinese brands (including NIO and XPeng) have made their respective capacity expansion plans.
NEV sales currently account for only 5% of total automotive sales. As such, not only does the NEV market still have high potential for growth, but this potential has also attracted new players, which are mostly consumer electronics and IoT vendors such as Xiaomi and OPPO, to enter the market. Given their lack of competencies in developing and manufacturing whole vehicles, these companies are instead acquiring existing automakers or utilizing ODM services. Therefore, automotive ODM services are likely to ramp up going forward, while automakers and ODMs will continue building factories via joint ventures, sharing their technologies, and jointly developing NEV models.