SPIL


2023-08-29

[News] CoWoS Demand Surges: TSMC Raises Urgent Orders by 20%, Non-TSMC Suppliers Benefit

According to a report from Taiwan’s TechNews, NVIDIA has delivered impressive results in its latest financial report, coupled with an optimistic outlook for its financial projections. This demonstrates that the demand for AI remains robust for the coming quarters. Currently, NVIDIA’s H100 and A100 chips both utilize TSMC’s CoWoS advanced packaging technology, making TSMC’s production capacity a crucial factor.

Examining the core GPU market, NVIDIA holds a dominant market share of 90%, while AMD accounts for about 10%. While other companies might adopt Google’s TPU or develop customized chips, they currently lack significant operational cost advantages.

In the short term, the shortage of CoWoS has led to tight chip supplies. However, according to a recent report by Morgan Stanley Securities, NVIDIA believes that TSMC’s CoWoS capacity won’t restrict shipments of the next quarter’s H100 GPUs. The company anticipates an increase in supply for each quarter next year. Simultaneously, TSMC is raising CoWoS prices by 20% for rush orders, indicating that the anticipated CoWoS bottleneck might alleviate.

According to industry sources, NVIDIA is actively diversifying its CoWoS supply chain away from TSMC. UMC, ASE, Amkor, and SPIL are significant players in this effort. Currently, UMC is expanding its interposer production capacity, aiming to double its capacity to relieve the tight CoWoS supply situation.

According to Morgan Stanley Securities, TSMC’s monthly CoWoS capacity this year is around 11,000 wafers, projected to reach 25,000 wafers by the end of next year. Non-TSMC CoWoS supply chain’s monthly capacity can reach 3,000 wafers, with a planned increase to 5,000 wafers by the end of next year.

(Photo credit: TSMC)

2023-08-25

[News] NVIDIA Establishes Non-TSMC CoWoS Supply Chain, UMC Doubles Interposer Capacity

According to a report from Taiwan’s Commercial Times, NVIDIA is aggressively establishing a non-TSMC CoWoS supply chain. Sources in the supply chain reveal that UMC is proactively expanding silicon interposer capacity, doubling it in advance, and now planning to further increase production by over two times. The monthly capacity for silicon interposers will surge from the current 3 kwpm (thousand wafers per month) to 10 kwpm, potentially aligning its capacity with TSMC’s next year, significantly alleviating the supply strain in the CoWoS process.

A prior report from Nomura Securities highlighted NVIDIA’s efforts since the end of Q2 this year to construct a non-TSMC supply chain. Key players include UMC for wafer fabrication, Amkor and SPIL for packaging and testing. NVIDIA aims to add suppliers to meet the surging demand for CoWoS solutions.

The pivotal challenge in expanding CoWoS production lies in insufficient silicon interposer supply. In the future, UMC will provide the silicon interposers for front-end CoW process, while Amkor and SPLI will take charge of the back-end WoS packaging. These collaborations will establish a non-TSMC CoWoS supply chain.

UMC states its current silicon interposer capacity stands at 3 kwpm. However, the company has decided to undertake a one-fold expansion at its Singaporean plant, targeting a capacity of around 6 kwpm. The additional capacity is anticipated to be progressively operational within 6 to 9 months, with the earliest projections for the first quarter of next year.

Yet, due to persistent robust market demand, it’s expected that even with UMC’s capacity expansion to 6 kwpm, it may not completely meet market needs. Consequently, industry sources suggest UMC has opted to further amplify silicon interposer capacity to 10 kwpm, aiming for a two-fold acceleration of production expansion. Addressing these expansion rumors, UMC affirms that growth in advanced packaging demand is an inherent trend and future focus, asserting their evaluation of capacity options and not ruling out the possibility of continuous enlargement of silicon interposer capabilities.

(Photo credit: Amkor)

2023-08-22

TSMC’s CoWoS Dominance: Amkor, ASE, JCET’s Response

In response to the demands of high-performance computing, AI, 5G, and other applications, the shift towards chiplet and the incorporation of HBM memory has become inevitable for advanced chips. As a result, packaging has transitioned from 2D to 2.5D and 3D formats.

With chip manufacturing advancing towards more advanced process nodes, the model of directly packaging chips using advanced packaging technology from wafer foundries has emerged. However, this approach also signifies that wafer foundries will encroach upon certain aspects of traditional assembly and testing, leading to ongoing discussions about the ‘threat’ to traditional assembly and test firms since TSMC’s entry into advanced packaging in 2011.

But is this perspective accurate?

In fact, traditional assembly and test firms remain competitively positioned. Firstly, numerous electronic products still rely on their diverse traditional packaging techniques. Particularly, with the rapid growth of AIoT, electric vehicles, and drones, the required electronic components often still adopt traditional packaging methods. Secondly, faced with wafer foundries actively entering the advanced packaging domain, traditional assembly and test firms have not been idle, presenting concrete solutions to the challenge.

Advanced Packaging Innovations by Traditional Assembly and Test Firms

Since 2023, AI and AI server trends have rapidly emerged, driving the demand for AI chips. TSMC’s 2.5D advanced packaging technology, known as CoWoS, has played a pivotal role. However, the sudden surge in demand stretched TSMC’s capacity. In response, major traditional assembly and test firms such as ASE and Amkor have demonstrated their technical prowess and have no intention of being absent from this field.

For instance, ASE’s FOCoS technology enables the integration of HBM and ASIC. It restructures multiple chips into a fan-out module, which is then placed on the substrate, achieving the integration of multiple chips. Their FOCoS-Bridge technology, unveiled in May this year, utilizes silicon bridges (Si Bridge) to accomplish 2.5D packaging, bolstering the creation of advanced chips required for applications like AI, data centers, and servers.

Additionally, SPIL, a subsidiary of ASE, offers the FO-EB technology, a powerful integration of logic IC and HBM. As depicted below, this technology eschews silicon interposers, utilizing silicon bridges and redistribution layers (RDL) for connections, similarly capable of 2.5D packaging.

Another major player, Amkor, has not only collaborated with Samsung to develop the H-Cube advanced packaging solution but has also long been involved in ‘CoWoS-like technology.’ Through intermediary layers and through-silicon via (TSV) technology, Amkor can interconnect different chips, also possessing 2.5D advanced packaging capabilities.

China’s major assembly and test firm, Jiangsu Changjiang Electronics Technology (JCET), employs the XDFOI technology, integrating logic ICs with HBM through TSV, RDL, and microbump techniques, aimed at high-performance computing.

Given the recent surge in demand for high-end GPU chips, TSMC’s CoWoS capacity has fallen short, and NVIDIA is actively seeking support from second or even third suppliers. The ASE Group and Amkor have secured partial orders through their packaging technologies. This clearly illustrates that traditional assembly and test firms, even when faced with the entry of wafer foundries into the advanced packaging domain, still possess the capability to compete.

In terms of product types, wafer foundries focus on advanced packaging technology for major players like NVIDIA and AMD. Meanwhile, other products not in the highest-end category still opt for traditional assembly and test firms like ASE, Amkor, and JCET for manufacturing. Overall, with their presence in advanced packaging, as well as a hold on the expanding existing packaging market, traditional assembly and test firms continue to maintain their market competitiveness.

(Photo credit: Amkor)

  • Page 2
  • 2 page(s)
  • 8 result(s)

Get in touch with us