On October 17th, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced an expansion of export control, tightening further restrictions. In addition to the previously restricted products like NVIDIA A100, H100, and AMD MI200 series, the updated measures now include a broader range, encompassing NVIDA A800, H800, L40S, L40, L42, AMD MI300 series, Intel Gaudi 2/3, and more, hindering their import into China. This move is expected to hasten the adoption of domestically developed chips by Chinese communications service providers (CSPs).

TrendForce’s Insights:

1. Chinese CSPs Strategically Invest in Both In-House Chip Development and Related Companies

In terms of the in-house chip development strategy of Chinese CSPs, Baidu announced the completion of tape out for the first generation Kunlun Chip in 2019, utilizing the XPU. It entered mass production in early 2020, with the second generation in production by 2021, boasting a 2-3 times performance improvement. The third generation is expected to be released in 2024. Aside from independent R&D, Baidu has invested in related companies like Nebula-Matrix, Phytium, Smartnvy, and. In March 2021, Baidu also established Kunlunxin through the split of its AI chip business.

Alibaba, in April 2018, fully acquired Chinese CPU IP supplier C-Sky and established T-head semiconductor in September of the same year. Their first self-developed chip, Hanguang 800, was launched in September 2020. Alibaba also invested in Chinese memory giant CXMT, AI IC design companies Vastaitech, Cambricon and others.

Tencent initially adopted an investment strategy, investing in Chinese AI chip company Enflame Tech in 2018. In 2020, it established Tencent Cloud and Smart Industries Group(CSIG), focusing on IC design and R&D. In November 2021, Tencent introduced AI inference chip Zixiao, utilizing 2.5D packaging for image and video processing, natural language processing, and search recommendation.

Huawei’s Hisilicon unveiled Ascend 910 in August 2019, accompanied by the AI open-source computing framework MindSpore. However, due to being included in the U.S. entity list, Ascend 910 faced production restrictions. In August 2023, iFLYTEK, a Chinese tech company, jointly introduced the “StarDesk AI Workstation” with Huawei, featuring the new AI chip Ascend 910B. This is likely manufactured using SMIC’s N+2 process, signifying Huawei’s return to self-developed AI chips.

2. Some Chinese Companies Turn to Purchasing Huawei’s Ascend 910B, Yet It Lags Behind A800

Huawei’s AI chips are not solely for internal use but are also sold to other Chinese companies. Baidu reportedly ordered 1,600 Ascend 910B chips from Huawei in August, valued at approximately 450 million RMB, to be used in 200 Baidu data center servers. The delivery is expected to be completed by the end of 2023, with over 60% of orders delivered as of October. This indicates Huawei’s capability to sell AI chips to other Chinese companies.

Huawei’s Ascend 910B, expected to be released in the second half of 2024, boasts hardware figures comparable to NVIDIA A800. According to tests conducted by Chinese companies, its performance is around 80% of A800. However, in terms of software ecosystem, Huawei still faces a significant gap compared to NVIDIA.

Overall, using Ascend 910B for AI training may be less efficient than A800. Yet with the tightening U.S. policies, Chinese companies are compelled to turn to Ascend 910B. As user adoption increases, Huawei’s ecosystem is expected to improve gradually, leading more Chinese companies to adopt its AI chips. Nevertheless, this will be a protracted process.

Xiaomi’s venture into automotive industry takes a significant stride as the company’s latest models, SU7 and SU7 Max, makes its debut in the latest catalog from China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. The listed entity is Beijing Automotive Group Co., Ltd. (BAIC), marked by the distinctive “Beijing Xiaomi” emblem on the rear.

Sources from Xiaomi’s car supply chain suggest an imminent small-scale trial production phase, hinting at the first model’s market introduction in February 2024, reported by UDN News.

As per the disclosure, the cars boast a 3,000mm wheelbase. SU7 will feature Fdbatt’s lithium iron phosphate batteries, and SU7 Max is complemented by CATL’s ternary lithium batteries. Interestingly, the smart driving features will not include an optional optical radar package.

The catalog showed Xiaomi’s car brand as Xiaomi, while the declared corporate entity is Beijing Automotive Group Off-Road Vehicle Co., Ltd. (BAIC ORV). The product’s rear proudly displays “Beijing Xiaomi.”

Despite leveraging BAIC’s production qualifications, Xiaomi’s car has its declared production address at the site of its self-established factory.

The car factory’s construction unfolds in two phases, with the first, covering approximately 720,000 square meters, achieving an annual capacity of 150,000 vehicles by June 2023. The second phase is slated to commence in 2024, concluding in 2025. Public records confirm the successful acceptance inspection of Xiaomi’s car first phase factory workshops on June 12.

Xiaomi Group Chairman Jun Lei’s October announcement highlighted smooth progress, anticipating an official launch in the first half of 2024.

Since Lei’s announcement of Xiaomi’s foray into smart cars, industry observers have closely monitored Xiaomi’s car dynamics. Internal sources reveal that Xiaomi’s car will leverage ICT industry experience to enhance operational efficiency across research, production, supply, and sales.

Xiaomi plans a US$10 billion investment in the automotive sector over the next decade. Operating in a wholly-owned model, Xiaomi aims to provide users with a comprehensive smart ecosystem and enrich their smart living experiences.

At the October Xiaomi product launch, the introduction of the HyperOS was a highlight, applicable not only to mobile devices but also set to feature in Xiaomi’s cars.

A notable addition revealed by National Business Daily, citing a supplier who visited Xiaomi’s car factory, is that the four major manufacturing process production lines (stamping, welding, painting, and final assembly) in Xiaomi’s car first phase factory are operational, engaging in small-scale trial production. With mass production scheduled to commence in December, Xiaomi’s car is poised for market launch in February next year.

(Image: China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology)

A global surge in data center expansion is observed in 2023, emphasizing a notable trend in the rise of Green Data Centers (Green DCs). Major players embarking on the construction of large-scale data centers encounter challenges. Power constraints affecting capacity growth, mounting pressure to enhance IT efficiency, combined with the continual increase in energy costs, amplify operational and construction difficulties in data centers.

TrendForce’s Insights:

1. Prioritizing energy efficiency and conservation in data centers

Modern enterprises heavily rely on data centers, but the associated energy costs are substantial. The market is expected to grow by over 25% from 2023 to 2030. Current strategies for improving energy efficiency encompass (1) reducing the energy consumption of IT equipment, (2) minimizing losses in distribution devices and uninterruptible power supplies, (3) implementing airflow management to optimize cooling, and (4) optimizing cooling and humidification systems through Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC).

2. Global shift to net-zero carbon emissions and the rise of low-carbon Green DCs

The construction of Green DCs with lower carbon is becoming a pivotal approach for major players, especially in the design of IT infrastructure for server rooms. This includes components such as network routers, switches, storage systems, firewalls, server racks, and redundant power supplies, all of which are subject to energy-saving requirements.

Key practices involve adopting liquid cooling and energy-efficient core IT equipment to achieve improved energy efficiency. Certification standards, such as Green Mark DC Platinum Certification, play a crucial role. The TIA-942 standard, by TIA and ANSI, distinguishing data centers into Tiers I through IV, often requires compliance with certifications like ISO 20000 and ISO 27001. Additionally, the international standard ISO/IEC 22237 lays the groundwork for globally planning, constructing, and operating data centers based on shared principles in the future.
(Image: TIA)

According to the article written by Tony Chen, Head of Investment Research at UBS Asset Management, the European Commission initiated an investigation in October into Chinese electric car manufacturers suspected of receiving national subsidies. The EU believes that Chinese state subsidies will create an “unfair trade competition environment” for EU electric car manufacturers.

If the EU’s investigation uncovers “subsidy evidence,” it will result in the calculation of corresponding “average anti-subsidy taxes,” which will apply to all electric vehicles imported from China, including prominent models produced in China such as Volkswagen, Tesla, BMW, and others.

The UBS research team suggests that, in the worst-case scenario, the EU may impose additional tariffs on Chinese electric cars imported into the EU.

What led to the trade conflict between China and the EU in electric vehicles? Firstly, the disparity in tariffs plays a crucial role.

Currently, Chinese cars entering the European market face a 10% import tariff, while in China, the situation is reversed, with a 15% tariff imposed on cars imported from Europe. This significant gap indicates potential room for negotiation.

Additionally, a report from the European Commission reveals that China’s market share for electric vehicles in Europe has risen to 8%, with expectations to reach 15% by 2025.

However, this figure includes cars manufactured in China for international brands, not exclusively domestically produced Chinese electric vehicles. According to JATO, an automotive industry research organization, the market share of “pure” Chinese brand electric vehicles in Europe was still below 1% as of the first half of this year. Nevertheless, overall, it underscores the strong presence of Chinese-manufactured electric vehicles in Europe.

From a practical standpoint, initiating a trade war in the electric vehicle sector involves consideration of various complex background factors. China is not only a primary supplier of raw materials to Europe but also a crucial market for European brands. In fact, China is already the world’s largest sales market for electric vehicles.

Chinese Electric Cars Enjoy High Margins, Positioned for Price Wars

The research team at UBS believes that, given the potential to boost sales through lower pricing, the competitive pricing of electric vehicles between Chinese and European brands will be crucial. Taking Tesla as an example, the company has adopted an aggressive pricing strategy for its EVs. In April, Tesla lowered the selling prices in the European region, with the retail price for the popular Model Y around €46,000. According to JATO, the Model Y is currently the best-selling EV in the European Union this year, showcasing the positive impact of a competitive pricing strategy on sales.

Following this argument, another set of data from JATO reveals that the selling prices of Chinese brand EVs in Europe range from €50,000 to €60,000, approximately in line with the European average.

In comparison, the average selling price of Chinese EVs domestically in China is only around €30,000. This indicates that Chinese EV manufacturers exporting to the European market enjoy relatively higher margins, providing them with the capability to engage in price wars. One major reason for the cost advantage of Chinese electric cars lies in battery manufacturing.

According to a previous report by TrendForce, Chinese battery manufacturers command a global market share exceeding 60%, allowing them to cover the entire battery production chain, share production costs, and continually advance new technologies. Since batteries represent approximately 40% of the total vehicle cost, Chinese electric cars offer superior cost-effectiveness.

On the other hand, the space for European car manufacturers to gain a competitive advantage through subsidies has gradually diminished. As the EV market expands, government subsidies in Europe are losing momentum. Germany has already reduced EV subsidies from €5,000 per vehicle to €3,000 this year.

Similarly, subsidies in the Netherlands, of a similar scale, are subject to quota limitations and were even exhausted by mid-2022. This implies that entering a price war could place European EVs at a relative disadvantage.

Overall, the EV market exhibits high price sensitivity, and European automakers face challenges in terms of cost competitiveness. In contrast, Chinese EV manufacturers have a cost advantage. Consequently, there is a growing possibility of a trade conflict in the European electric vehicle market.

(Photo credit: Pixabay)

In the previous articles (China Strives to Break Through U.S. Restrictions in Mature Processes, Aiming for Over 30% Global Share by 2027 and China’s Wafer Fabs Hits 44 with Future Expansion 32, Mainly Targeting on The Mature Process) we explored the overall layout of Chinese wafer fab and developments in 12-inch and 8-inch wafer foundries. This article shifts to navigating the challenges of preventing oversupply while strategically pushing forward in the realm of mature processes.

Due to the counterattack of international giants in mature processes leads to fierce competition for orders, the recent surge in mature processes over the past two years in fact has brought pressure to Chinese wafer fabs. From the perspective of the industry chain, it may also cause industry overcapacity.

The popularity of mature processes can be traced back to its extensive application market, research and development of advanced processes approaching the limit of Moore’s Law.

No need to say it also reflects the regular operation of market dynamics. In the current economic downturn, the demand for automotive electronics and industrial control systems(ICS) is booming, with 80% of their demand falling under mature processes. As the AI trend rises, many high-end AI and computing chips in China cannot adopt advanced processes, prompting a reconsideration of design changes to use multiple mature process chips instead of a single high-end process chip. This not only ensures shipments but also indirectly increases the synchronous multiplier of mature process chips.

Can Specialty Processes Become a Blue Ocean for China?

With the emergence of new demands in downstream application scenarios, the variety of semiconductor products continues to increase. Industry insiders state that global foundries are competing to target mature process wafer foundries. In this context, Chinese wafer fabs should focus on creating differentiation.

Therefore, specialty processes are gradually gaining attention in the current development of wafer foundries. In comparison to advanced logic processes, specialty processes particularly emphasize the research, innovation, and application of new materials (SiC and GaN are currently popular), new structures, and new devices. Specialty processes highlight wafer processes with custom capabilities for special IP and diverse technological categories. This is considered an important development branch beyond Moore’s Law, which involves continually reducing the linewidth to enhance chip integration.

Specialty process product categories are extensive and can form a competitive advantage in specific areas. These mainly include embedded/independent non-volatile memory, power devices, analog and power management, sensors, and other process platforms.

Representative enterprises in China’s specialty process industry include SMIC, Huarun Microelectronics, and Huahong Group. These companies attach great importance to the development of specialty processes. To meet the differentiated demands for product functionality and performance in the market, enterprises continually research and innovate wafer manufacturing process technologies, evolving into differentiated manufacturing processes.

For example, Huahong Semiconductor’s specialty processes include power management, radio frequency, power devices, and other platforms, especially in wafer foundry for power devices; Huarun focuses on high-voltage power BCD, high-performance BCD, high-reliability BCD, high-precision analog, MEMS, and six major special power device simulation wafer foundry processes.

Major wafer foundries have always attached great importance to the development of specialty processes. TSMC’s specialty process is leading by far, while GlobalFoundries and UMC are also focusing on mature processes and specialty processes. It is not difficult to predict that there will be fewer and fewer participants chasing advanced processes in the future, and new entrants will compete for the market in specialty processes.
(Image: SMIC)